Market Intelligence
See where federal funding is moving — before procurement systems show it.
Track House CPF and Senate CDS funding by chamber, agency, state, and project category. Every chart answers a business question: where should you be focused next?
FY2022–FY2027 enacted and requested data. FY2027 requests are already searchable.
What this page helps you answer
- →Which agencies are receiving the most earmark-directed funding?
- →Where requested Senate CDS activity signals future demand.
- →How House CPF and Senate CDS patterns differ by year and chamber.
- →Which funding categories may become grant, procurement, or construction opportunities.
- →Where a BD team, grant writer, lobbyist, or AEC firm should focus next.
Why these trends matter
CPF and CDS projects are visible before many traditional procurement or grant opportunities appear. FFID helps teams identify funded recipients, member priorities, agency patterns, and geographic demand earlier than SAM.gov or downstream award databases.
- ✓Requested projects reveal demand before final appropriations.
- ✓Enacted projects show what became law.
- ✓Agency momentum reveals where congressional priorities are shifting.
- ✓Repeat recipients may indicate ongoing capital programs.
Request Pipeline vs Enacted Funding
The gap between requested and enacted is where market intelligence lives.
Requested projects show demand before final appropriations. Enacted projects show what became law. The gap between the two reveals where competition, political support, and future opportunity are forming. Requested records are pipeline signals — not guaranteed funding.
Senate CDS active pipeline (FY2027)
$51.9B
13,374 requests
Senate CDS enacted FY2024
$7.6B
3,797 projects
Historical enactment rate
~20%
of requested amount
Implied FY2027 enacted range
~$10.4B
if historical rate holds
Toggle between dollars and project count
House CPF FY2026 pipeline
$4.1B
502 requests
Senate CDS FY2024
$7.6B
3,797 projects
Senate CDS FY2027 pipeline
$51.9B
13,374 requests
House CPF growth
-100%
FY2022 → FY2025 enacted
Senate CDS growth
+101%
FY2022 → FY2024 enacted
Where is congressional appetite growing fastest?
Year-over-year House CPF and Senate CDS activity — where directed spending is expanding and where the forward pipeline is building.
So what?
What changed
House CPF enacted declined -100% from FY2022 to FY2025 — from $4.0B to $0.0B. FY2026 CPF pipeline: $4.1B requested across 502 projects (not yet enacted). Senate CDS enacted grew +101% FY2022–FY2024. The FY2027 Senate active pipeline is $51.9B.
Why it matters
Both chambers are directing more funding each cycle. The Senate requested pipeline shows demand before appropriations are finalized — giving teams lead time to identify funded recipients before the market forms.
Who should care
AEC firms and BD teams building annual pursuit pipelines. Lobbyists tracking member CPF/CDS patterns on behalf of clients. Grant consultants advising on competitive timing.
Which agencies are creating the most downstream opportunity?
Agencies receiving the most CPF/CDS activity — FY2022–FY2026 · Enacted only · Where BD teams, AEC firms, and consultants should focus first
| # | Agency | Total (enacted) | Projects | Avg award | Recent trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transportation (DOT) | $13.9B | 4,873 | $2.8M | → Stable |
| 2 | Army Corps (USACE) | $7.9B | 796 | $9.9M | ↑ Rising |
| 3 | Environment (EPA) | $7.0B | 3,068 | $2.3M | ↓ Cooling |
| 4 | Veterans Affairs (VA) | $4.2B | 1,239 | $3.4M | ↑ Rising |
| 5 | Health & Services (HHS) | $3.6B | 2,556 | $1.4M | ↓ Cooling |
| 6 | Justice (DOJ) | $3.5B | 2,557 | $1.4M | ↑ Rising |
| 7 | Education (ED) | $2.7B | 1,457 | $1.9M | ↑ Rising |
So what?
What changed
DOT and Army Corps lead all agencies by total enacted earmark dollars FY2022–FY2026. HUD, EPA, and HHS round out the top five. A ↑ Rising trend signals increasing congressional direction toward that agency lane.
Why it matters
Agency dominance reveals where capital programs are concentrated. Firms tracking agency momentum can identify funded recipients — and the services they will need — before procurement windows open.
Who should care
AEC firms and engineers organized by agency lane (water, transportation, housing). BD leaders building vertical market strategies. Government affairs teams with agency-specific policy focus.
Key insights
House CPF declined (-100%)
House Community Project Funding declined -100% from FY2022 to FY2025 — from $4.0B to $0.0B. Project count declined from 1,603 to 0. FY2026 CPF pipeline: $4.1B requested across 502 projects (not yet enacted).
Senate FY2027 pipeline: $51.9B
FY2027 Senate CDS requests total $51.9B across 13,374 projects — the active forward pipeline. At ~20% historical enactment rate, roughly $10.4B is expected to become law when appropriations are finalized.
Senate CDS enacted growing (+101%)
Senate CDS enacted funding grew +101% from FY2022 to FY2024 — from $3.8B to $7.6B across 3,797 projects. FY2025 Senate funding was permanently frozen under P.L. 119-4 (Full-Year CR) and will not have enacted data. FY2026 enacted data pending appropriations.
DOT dominates transportation
Transportation earmarks peaked at $5.6B in FY2024 before moderating. Still the largest cumulative agency across 6 fiscal years of enacted data.
FY2027 Context
FY2027 requests are already searchable.
Senate CDS FY2027 is fully live across all 9 subcommittees. House CPF FY2027 is live for 8 of 9 subcommittees, with FSGG added as soon as the Committee publishes it. The teams already building relationships with funded recipients and tracking active members are the ones positioned to win as the rest of FY2027 funding is directed.
The FY2022–FY2026 data on this page is the historical intelligence base. Every trend you see represents funded recipients, active members, and agency priorities that are already shaping the live FY2027 pipeline.
State Momentum
Where should your BD team focus first?
Enacted + requested combined · All fiscal years · Click any state to search its projects
So what?
What changed
A small number of states account for a disproportionate share of total earmark funding. The request pipeline tab shows where demand is building before the next appropriations cycle.
Why it matters
High-activity states have the most funded recipients to pursue. Teams that focus geographically can build relationships before competitors see the procurement — and before the RFP makes the opportunity public.
Who should care
AEC firms planning territory coverage and BD pipelines. Grant consultants advising municipal and nonprofit clients by state. Lobbyists tracking delegation funding on behalf of clients.
Take action
Project Category Trends
Which project sectors are seeing the most congressional investment?
Enacted + requested combined · All fiscal years · Click any category to search its projects
So what?
What changed
Transportation, water/environment, and education consistently lead by total dollars. Healthcare, housing, and flood control show significant requested pipelines — sectors where demand may be building before appropriations are finalized.
Why it matters
Category trends reveal where congressional priorities are concentrating by sector. Categories with large requested pipelines and lower enacted ratios may signal emerging opportunity — the window before the RFP cycle opens.
Who should care
AEC firms and consultants organized by project type (water, roads, public facilities, transit). Grant consultants advising nonprofits and municipalities on sector-specific requests. BD teams building vertical market focus.
Recipient Momentum
Organizations receiving the most CPF/CDS funding
Enacted + requested combined · All fiscal years · Click any recipient to view their full funding history
Why it matters
Organizations receiving earmarks repeatedly across fiscal years often have ongoing capital programs, established congressional relationships, and future project needs. AEC firms, vendors, grant writers, and lobbyists can use recipient momentum to identify organizations most likely to need services before RFPs are issued. A multi-year badge indicates the recipient has received funding in more than one fiscal year.
Member Funding Patterns
Members associated with the most CPF/CDS activity
Enacted + requested combined · All fiscal years · Click any member to view their projects
Why it matters
Members with consistent multi-year CPF/CDS activity often reflect district infrastructure priorities and established appropriations relationships. Lobbyists, government affairs teams, and consultants can use member patterns to understand where congressional priorities are concentrated and which offices are most active in directing federal funding to their districts.
Signals Worth Acting On
Trends are useful only when they lead to action.
FFID connects macro funding movement to the underlying projects, recipients, members, agencies, and states behind the numbers.
- →Rising requested funding may indicate future appropriations pressure — track it now, not after enactment.
- →Repeat recipients may signal ongoing capital programs your team can pursue.
- →Agency growth reveals where congressional priorities are shifting before RFPs appear.
- →State-level concentration can guide territory planning and outreach.
- →Sector momentum helps BD teams prioritize before the competition catches up.