University of Connecticut
For more than 30 years, a regional concrete supplier in Connecticut and Massachusetts unknowingly used an aggregate from a nearby quarry that contained unusually high levels of an iron sulfide mineral called pyrrhotite. Over time, in the presence of water and oxygen, the pyrrhotite will oxidize and form iron oxides and sulfuric acid. Both the iron oxides and sulfuric acid damage the concrete over time by expanding within the concrete. This expansion causes the concrete to crack, lose strength and eventually deteriorate to the point of no longer being structurally sound.\r\n \r\nThere is presently no established method or risk-rating system to estimate how many will need to be replaced or how many can be saved with mitigation methods before they reach the status of damage that replacement becomes the only option.\r\n \r\nTo remedy this problem, a risk rating scale is currently under development at UConn utilizing a combination of field-based forensic data and laboratory-based tests, to anticipate the potential damage on a house depending on the pyrrhotite content and other conditions that affect structural deterioration. This rating scale will ultimately be used to prioritize houses requiring remediation as well as providing guidance to assist with the real estate market. To date, progress has been made towards the development and implementation of a test method that allows for the acquisition of consistent data. The expansion of data collection is critically needed to obtain an adequate base for the development and validation of the risk-rating system, as well as moving the test method towards an accepted standard that can be adopted by commercial and research laboratories nationally and internationally. From a mitigation standpoint, there is also a need to expand testing chemically treating, drying and sealing concrete containing pyrrhotite-laced aggregate to try and slow or stop the oxidization process.\r\n \r\n
Amount Appropriated
$4.0M
Federal Funding Lifecycle
FY2023FFID tracks stages 1–2 — stages 3–5 vary by agency, assistance type, and earmark structure.
Congressional Request
Member submits CPF / CDS
FFIDEnacted
Signed into appropriations law
FFIDAgency Administration
Procurement route not yet determined
SAM.gov / Grants.gov
Opportunity posted publicly
Federal Award
Obligation recorded in USASpending
Evidence Dossier
Federal Award Record
Start a free trial to access this section.
Start free trial →Supporting Evidence
Start a free trial to access this section.
Start free trial →Tier A = Congressional Record or GovInfo. Tier B = committee report or member disclosure. ✓ Verified = exact document match. ~ Verified recipient = entity-level match only.
Enacted — no verified award linked by FFID
This project has been enacted into law. FFID has not yet linked a verified feder…
Start a free trial to see the full commercial context →Project Description
For more than 30 years, a regional concrete supplier in Connecticut and Massachusetts unknowingly used an aggregate from a nearby quarry that contained unusually high levels of an iron sulfide mineral called pyrrhotite. Over time, in the presence of water and oxygen, the pyrrhotite will oxidize and form iron oxides and sulfuric acid. Both the iron oxides and sulfuric acid damage the concrete over time by expanding within the concrete. This expansion causes the concrete to crack, lose strength and eventually deteriorate to the point of no longer being structurally sound.\r\n \r\nThere is presently no established method or risk-rating system to estimate how many will need to be replaced or how many can be saved with mitigation methods before they reach the status of damage that replacement becomes the only option.\r\n \r\nTo remedy this problem, a risk rating scale is currently under development at UConn utilizing a combination of field-based forensic data and laboratory-based tests, to anticipate the potential damage on a house depending on the pyrrhotite content and other conditions that affect structural deterioration. This rating scale will ultimately be used to prioritize houses requiring remediation as well as providing guidance to assist with the real estate market. To date, progress has been made towards the development and implementation of a test method that allows for the acquisition of consistent data. The expansion of data collection is critically needed to obtain an adequate base for the development and validation of the risk-rating system, as well as moving the test method towards an accepted standard that can be adopted by commercial and research laboratories nationally and internationally. From a mitigation standpoint, there is also a need to expand testing chemically treating, drying and sealing concrete containing pyrrhotite-laced aggregate to try and slow or stop the oxidization process.\r\n \r\n
Sponsoring Member
Joe Courtney
Representative · CT
Want to see more like this?
Start a free 7-day trial for full member intelligence, recipient funding history, opportunity scores, CSV export, and all 112,898 projects.
Data Provenance
- Source
- House Appropriations Committee
- Status
- enacted
- Fiscal Year
- FY2023
- Category
- other unclassified
- Use Case
- disaster resilience hazard mitigation
Found an error in this record?
Report a data errorTechnical & source detail
Embed this project
Share a live status card on your site or article.
<iframe src="https://federalfundingintelligence.com/api/embed/654cd0e3-d809-4962-bb10-afaf3c582866" width="100%" height="190" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;" title="Federal earmark project"></iframe>Find more like this
Procurement pursuit intelligence
This project has been enacted. FFID maps funded projects to likely downstream procurement channels — including recipient portals, state and local systems, agency programs, and Grants.gov. SAM.gov is monitored, but many CPF/CDS-funded opportunities appear first through recipient or state/local procurement systems.
Principals
Inferred procurement pathway
low confidenceLikely procurement owner
unknown
Funding vehicle
grant
Expected channel
Multiple channels — see below
FFID could not determine the procurement channel with high confidence for this agency and category combination. Check the agency program page, Grants.gov, the state procurement portal, and the recipient's own procurement page.
Agency not specifically mapped. Check Grants.gov and the recipient's own procurement portal.
Discovery sources to check manually
Discovery onlyThese portals are not verified matches for this project. SAM.gov and state portals are general search starting points — not confirmed procurement channels.
Not project-specific. Portal coverage varies by state. Check all channels manually.
Procurement signals
Procurement monitoring has not yet run for this project. No conclusion can be drawn about whether an opportunity exists.