Army Corps of Engineers
Following Hurricane Katrina, the Federal Government invested $561 Million to rebuild and expand the Port of Gulfport. However, even with the supply chain challenges the country currently faces, the Port of Gulfport remains woefully underutilized because of the limited depth of the Federal Navigation Channel. Vessels cannot divert to Gulfport because they cannot get into the Port of Gulfport and only small cargo ships may use the facility. Many of the vessels that do call the Port of Gulfport must unload cargo at other ports to reduce draft before entering the Port of Gulfport. In order to get a return on the substantial federal investment that was made, a deeper channel is necessary. \nThe Port of Gulfport is one of 17 Strategic Seaports in the United States. A deeper and wider channel into Gulfport would enhance national security by expanding the size and number of military vessels that can utilize the port. Recently, a Bob Hope class military vessel was diverted due to weather and contacted the Port of Gulfport seeking safe harbor. The Port of Gulfport had to turn it away because of the lack of channel depth.\nThe Port of Gulfport is just 5 miles from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and only 18 miles from the shipping lanes, making a prime location for international trade. Average vessel size to the Gulf of Mexico is 6,300 TEU and continues to increase. Maximum vessel size for Gulfport is 2,602 TEU at current authorized depth. Comparison demand forecasts for Gulfport show container volume at 465,316 TEU/year by 2050 without deepening, as compared to 217,000 TEU in 2017. With a deepened channel, demand forecasts show container volume at 1,002,616 TEU/year by 2050, more than double than the forecast without a deeper channel. \nDeepening the channel would create greater efficiency and lowered transport costs which lead to improved national economy, safer transportation, less environmental impact and improved national security.
Amount Appropriated
$200,000
Federal Funding Lifecycle
FY2023FFID tracks stages 1–2 — stages 3–5 vary by agency, assistance type, and earmark structure.
Congressional Request
Member submits CPF / CDS
FFIDEnacted
Signed into appropriations law
FFIDAgency Administration
Procurement route not yet determined
SAM.gov / Grants.gov
Opportunity posted publicly
Federal Award
Obligation recorded in USASpending
Enacted — no verified award linked by FFID
This project has been enacted into law. FFID has not yet linked a verified feder…
Start a free trial to see the full commercial context →Project Description
Following Hurricane Katrina, the Federal Government invested $561 Million to rebuild and expand the Port of Gulfport. However, even with the supply chain challenges the country currently faces, the Port of Gulfport remains woefully underutilized because of the limited depth of the Federal Navigation Channel. Vessels cannot divert to Gulfport because they cannot get into the Port of Gulfport and only small cargo ships may use the facility. Many of the vessels that do call the Port of Gulfport must unload cargo at other ports to reduce draft before entering the Port of Gulfport. In order to get a return on the substantial federal investment that was made, a deeper channel is necessary. \nThe Port of Gulfport is one of 17 Strategic Seaports in the United States. A deeper and wider channel into Gulfport would enhance national security by expanding the size and number of military vessels that can utilize the port. Recently, a Bob Hope class military vessel was diverted due to weather and contacted the Port of Gulfport seeking safe harbor. The Port of Gulfport had to turn it away because of the lack of channel depth.\nThe Port of Gulfport is just 5 miles from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and only 18 miles from the shipping lanes, making a prime location for international trade. Average vessel size to the Gulf of Mexico is 6,300 TEU and continues to increase. Maximum vessel size for Gulfport is 2,602 TEU at current authorized depth. Comparison demand forecasts for Gulfport show container volume at 465,316 TEU/year by 2050 without deepening, as compared to 217,000 TEU in 2017. With a deepened channel, demand forecasts show container volume at 1,002,616 TEU/year by 2050, more than double than the forecast without a deeper channel. \nDeepening the channel would create greater efficiency and lowered transport costs which lead to improved national economy, safer transportation, less environmental impact and improved national security.
Sponsoring Member
Steven Palazzo
Representative · MS
See every project Steven Palazzo has sponsored, broken out by fiscal year and status.
Start 7-day trial →Recipient Organization
Army Corps of Engineers
This recipient has 329 other projects funded in FFID. See the full history.
Start 7-day trial →You hit 3 locked fields on this project.
Unlock sponsor history, recipient funding, and full commercial context — free for 7 days.
Data Provenance
- Source
- House Appropriations Committee
- Status
- enacted
- Fiscal Year
- FY2023
- Category
- other unclassified
- Use Case
- planning design engineering
- Opportunity Score
- Unlock score →
Found an error in this record?
Report a data errorTechnical & source detail
Embed this project
Share a live status card on your site or article.
<iframe src="https://federalfundingintelligence.com/api/embed/1e20308e-2ab8-48c5-a9da-427da5c4d003" width="100%" height="190" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;" title="Federal earmark project"></iframe>Find more like this
Procurement pursuit intelligence
This project has been enacted. FFID maps funded projects to likely downstream procurement channels — including recipient portals, state and local systems, agency programs, and Grants.gov. SAM.gov is monitored, but many CPF/CDS-funded opportunities appear first through recipient or state/local procurement systems.
Principals
Army Corps of Engineers
Grant recipient
Confirmed from FFID congressional source · website not yet enriched
Inferred procurement pathway
low confidenceLikely procurement owner
unknown
Funding vehicle
grant
Expected channel
Multiple channels — see below
FFID could not determine the procurement channel with high confidence for this agency and category combination. Check the agency program page, Grants.gov, the state procurement portal, and the recipient's own procurement page.
Agency not specifically mapped. Check Grants.gov and the recipient's own procurement portal.
Discovery sources to check manually
Discovery onlyThese portals are not verified matches for this project. SAM.gov and state portals are general search starting points — not confirmed procurement channels.
Not project-specific. Portal coverage varies by state. Check all channels manually.
Procurement signals
Procurement monitoring has not yet run for this project. No conclusion can be drawn about whether an opportunity exists.